Exploring How English Teachers Can Integrate Generative AI into English Language Teaching
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61173/xbe84g72Keywords:
Generative Artificial Intelligence, English Language TeachingAbstract
Because of the rapid development of generative artificial intelligence (AI), the possibility of introducing GAI into educational settings is gaining more and more attention. This is especially true with the release of ChatGPT in 2023. This study focusses on the application of artificial intelligence (AI) in English language instruction from four different points of view: the creation of materials, the preparation of lessons, the checking of grammar, and the role of a learning partner. In this section, we will expand upon the instructors’ perspectives on the uses and effectiveness of employing GAI in education, as derived from current research that are linked to this topic. The paper will also emphasize the value of AI literacy training for teachers and the necessity of a balanced approach between human teaching and the use of GAI. This is done with the intention of assisting English teachers in the process of changing traditional education for the development of GAI.
References
[1] Weizenbaum, J. (1966). ELIZA—a computer program for the study of natural language communication between man and machine. Communications of the ACM, 9(1), 36-45..
[2] Kohnke, L., Moorhouse, B. L., & Zou, D. (2023). ChatGPT for language teaching and learning. Relc Journal, 54(2), 537- 550.
[3] Lim, W. M., Gunasekara, A., Pallant, J. L., Pallant, J. I., & Pechenkina, E. (2023). Generative AI and the future of education: Ragnarök or reformation? A paradoxical perspective from, management educators. The international journal of management education, 21(2), 100790.
[4] Fryer, L. K., Nakao, K., & Thompson, A. (2019). Chatbot learning partners: Connecting learning experiences, interest and competence. Computers in human Behavior, 93, 279-289.
[5] Jeon, J., & Lee, S. (2023). Large language models in education: A focus on the complementary relationship between human teachers and ChatGPT. Education and Information Technologies, 28(12), 15873-15892.
[6] Bonner, E., Lege, R., & Frazier, E. (2023). Large Language Model-Based Artificial Intelligence in the Language Classroom: Practical Ideas for Teaching. Teaching English with Technology, 23(1), 23-41.
[7] Chowdhary, K., & Chowdhary, K. R. (2020). Natural language processing. Fundamentals of artificial intelligence, 603-649.
[8] Jeong, K. O. (2017). Preparing EFL student teachers with new technologies in the Korean context. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 30(6), 488-509.
[9] Chiu, T. K. (2023). The impact of Generative AI (GenAI) on practices, policies and research direction in education: A case of ChatGPT and Midjourney. Interactive Learning Environments, 1-17.
[10] An, X., Chai, C. S., Li, Y., Zhou, Y., Shen, X., Zheng, C., & Chen, M. (2023). Modeling English teachers’ behavioral intention to use artificial intelligence in middle schools. Education and Information Technologies, 28(5), 5187-5208.
[11] Rog, L. J., & Burton, W. (2001). Matching texts and readers: Leveling early reading materials for assessment and instruction. The Reading Teacher, 55(4), 348-356
[12] van den Berg, G., & du Plessis, E. (2023). ChatGPT and generative AI: Possibilities for its contribution to lesson planning, critical thinking and openness in teacher education. Education Sciences, 13(10), 998.
[13] Koraishi, O. (2023). Teaching English in the age of AI: Embracing ChatGPT to optimize EFL materials and assessment. Language Education and Technology, 3(1).
[14] Lee, J. H., Shin, D., & Noh, W. (2023). Artificial intelligence-based content generator technology for young English-as-a-foreign-language learners’reading enjoyment. RELC Journal, 54(2), 508-516.
[15] Jensen, L. (2001). Planning lessons. Teaching English as a Second or Foreign Language. Boston, MA: Heinle&Heinly.
[16] Moorhouse, B. L., Wan, Y., Wu, C., Kohnke, L., Ho, T. Y., & Kwong, T. (2024). Developing language teachers’ professional generative AI competence: An intervention study in an initial language teacher education course. System, 125, 103399.
[17] Marzuki, Widiati, U., Rusdin, D., Darwin, & Indrawati, Dean&Francis ISSN 2959-6122 I. (2023). The impact of AI writing tools on the content and organization of students’ writing: EFL teachers’ perspective. Cogent Education, 10(2), 2236469.
[18] Fitria, T. N. (2021). Grammarly as AI-powered English writing assistant: Students’ alternative for writing English. Metathesis: Journal of English Language, Literature, and Teaching, 5(1), 65-78.
[19] Toncic, J. (2020). Teachers, AI grammar checkers, and the newest literacies: Emending writing pedagogy and assessment. Digital Culture & Education, 12(1), 26.
[20] Park, J. (2019). An AI-based English Grammar Checker vs. Human Raters in Evaluating EFL Learners’ Writing. Multimedia-Assisted Language Learning, 22(1).
[21] Ji, H., Han, I., & Ko, Y. (2023). A systematic review of conversational AI in language education: Focusing on the collaboration with human teachers. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 55(1), 48-63.
[22] Gudmundsdottir, G. B., & Hatlevik, O. E. (2018). Newly qualified teachers’ professional digital competence: implications for teacher education. European Journal of Teacher Education, 41(2), 214-231.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 by the authors.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
