The promotion of heavy industry: An analysis of industrial transformation in three middle-income countries
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61173/sgm0jq19Keywords:
industrialization, heavy industry policy, mid-dle-income country, country brand, industrial transforma-tionAbstract
Heavy industry policy has an important impact on industrial transformation in middle-income countries. South Korea, China, and Brazil upgraded their heavy industries in the 1970s and 1980s, with varying results and thus affecting their levels of economic development.
References
Anne-Marie Maculan. (2013). Embraer and the growth of the Brazilian aircraft industry. 7(1–2), 41–59. https://doi. org/10.1504/IJTG.2013.052030
Cao, S., & Li, Q. (2018). Educational Development Priorities in Three Developing Countries: A Comparative Study. Renmin University of China Education Journal, 04.
Chen, C. (2023). A comparative study of industrialization development paths between Brazil and South Korea after World War II. 东南亚研究 , 04. https://doi.org/10.19561/j.cnki. sas.2023.04.040
Chen, H. (2022). Study on the influence of Sino-foreign joint ventures on the development of China’s automobile industry. Engineering Science and Technology II, 09. https://doi. org/10.27660/d.cnki.gzczu.2021.000008
Deng, Z., Zhuo, L., & Lin, Z. (2013). Comparison of industrialization process between China and South Korea: Commonality, gap and prospect. Journal of Northeast Asia, 02. https://doi.org/10.19498/j.cnki.dbyxk.2013.02.012 Francisco Anuatti-Neto, Milton Barossi-Filho, A. Gledson de
Carvalho, & Roberto Brás Matos Macedo. (2011). Costs and Benefits of Privatization: Evidence from Brazil. IDB Working Paper, 164.
Jiang, F. (2015). The historical experience and enlightenment of the Korean government in promoting industrial development in Dean&Francis Linhao Feng the middle and late period of industrialization. China Economic and Trade Guide, 04.
Jwa Sung-Hee, & Lee Sung-Kyu. (2019). The Heavy-Chemical Industrialization Policy Reevaluation in Korea from the Perspective of the “General Theory of Economic Development.” Journal of Business & Economic Policy, 7(2). https://doi. org/10.30845/jbep.v7n2p2
Kyoung-ho Shin, & Paul S. Ciccantell. (2009). The Steel and Shipbuilding Industries of South Korea: Rising East Asia and Globalization. Journal of World- Systems Research, 15(2), 92– 167. https://doi.org/10.5195/jwsr.2009.316 Lawrence J. Lau, Steven Rivkin, Dean T. Jamison, & Shu-
Cheng Liu. (1993). Education and economic growth Some cross-sectional evidence from Brazil. Journal of Development Economics, 41(1), 45–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304- 3878(93)90036-M
Li, G. (2008). Analysis on the Theoretical basis of Latin American Economic Reform—Neoliberal economics and Latin American economic Reform. Journal of Latin American Studies, 30(06).
R.M. Auty. (1992). The macro impacts of Korea’s Heavy industry drive re‐evaluated. The Journal of Development Studies, 29(1).
Simon Schwartzman. (2004). Equity, quality and relevance in higher education in Brazil. Bras. Ciênc., 76(1). https://doi. org/10.1590/S0001-37652004000100015
Yang, Z. (2013). Effects of economic reform in Brazil and its implications. Contemporary World, 07.
Yuan, R., & Wu, C. (1996). Comparison of higher education and economic development model of “Four Tigers” in Asia. Education & Economy, 01.
YUMI HORIKANE. (2005). The Political Economy of Heavy Industrialization: The Heavy and Chemical Industry (HCI)
Push in South Korea in the 1970s. Modern Asian Studies, 39(2). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0026749X0400160X
Zhao, P. (2018). Rethinking neoliberal economic reform in Brazil. Reform & Openning, 05.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 by the authors.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
