Of the Three Artists—Frida Kahlo, Meret Oppenheim, and Judy Chicago—Who Had the Most Significant Impact on Feminism, and Why

Authors

  • Di Lu

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61173/3np3n946

Keywords:

feminist art, feminism, Frida Kahlo, Meret Oppenheim, Judy Chicago,, Frida’s self-portraits, the Ob-ject, the Dinner Party

Abstract

From the middle 19th century, the beginning of the first wave of the feminist movement, the feminist movements contributed to the stimulation of the appearance of female artists and the ascend of their status in society. At the same time, the existence and artwork of these female artists also promoted the development of feminism and helped spread feminist ideas. This dissertation compared three representative female artists related strongly to feminism, Frida Kahlo, Meret Oppenheim, and Judy Chicago, to know who had the most critical influence on feminism development and why. By analyzing data, mainly qualitative, gathered from the previous research and interviewing a scholar specialized in feminist art, this research first explains the connections between the three artists and feminism. Following, the research compares the three artists’ influences on feminist development, using four criteria: the embodiment of feminist pursuits in personal experiences, the representation of feminism in the artist’s work, the use of works for feminist propaganda, and the circulation of their works. Depending on these criteria to compare the three artists reciprocally, among the three artists, Judy Chicago might be the artist who influenced the development of feminism the most.

References

Brand, P.Z. (2006) ‘Feminist Art Epistemologies: Understanding feminist art’, Hypatia, 21(3), pp. 166-189. doi:10.1353/hyp.2006.0021.

Chicago, J. et al. (2023) Judy Chicago: Herstory. London, NY: Phaidon Press in association with ; New Museum.

Cocks, N. (2011) ‘On Frida Kahlo’s moustache: A reading of self-portrait with cropped hair and its criticism’, The Last Taboo, pp. 191–205. doi:10.7228/manchester/9780719075001.003.0011. C o o e y, P. M . ( 1 9 9 4 ) R e l i g i o u s i m a g i n a - t i o n a n d t h e b o d y [ P r e p r i n t ] . d o i : 1 0 . 1 0 9 3 / oso/9780195087352.001.0001.

Curiger, B. (1986) ‘Meret Oppenheim’, Woman’s Art Journal, 7(1), p. 51. doi:10.2307/1358240.

Deffebach, P. et al. (2023) Training microentrepreneurs over zoom: Experimental evidence from Mexico [Preprint]. doi:10.1596/1813-9450-10574. Entering the picture: Judy Chicago, the Fresno Feminist Art Program, and The Collective Visions of Women Art-

ists. (2012). Choice Reviews Online, 49(09). doi:10.5860/ choice.49-4851

Jones, A. (1995) ‘Power and feminist art (history)’, Art History, 18(3), pp. 435-443. doi:10.1111/j.1467- 8365.1995.tb00633.x. Judy Chicago: A retrospective (no date) FAMSF. Available at: https://www.famsf.org/exhibitions/judy-chicago (Accessed: 18 September 2024). Kahlo, Frida, and Luis-Martín. Lozano. Frida Kahlo. Bulfinch Press, 2000.

Kahlo, F. et al. (2007) Frida Kahlo. Minneapolis: Walker Art Center.

Nochlin, L. (2018) ‘Why have there been no great women artists?’, Women, Art, and Power and Other Essays, pp. 145–178. doi:10.4324/9780429502996-7.

Oppenheim, M. et al. (1996) Meret Oppenheim: Beyond the teacup. New York: Independent Curators Inc. and D.A.P./Distributed Art Publishers.

Schapiro, M. (1972) ‘The education of women as art- Dean&Francis ISSN 2959-6122 ists: Project womanhouse’, Art Journal, 31(3), p. 268. doi:10.2307/775513.

SOYSUREN, U. and ZÖNGÜR, C. (2021) ‘Meret Oppenheim ve HEYKELLERİ’, Tykhe Sanat ve Tasarım Dergisi, 6(11), pp. 141–160. doi:10.55004/tykhe.946160.

Springer, J., Jones, A. and Chicago, J. (1999) ‘Sexual politics: Judy Chicago’s “Dinner party” in feminist art history’, Woman’s Art Journal, 20(1), p. 52. doi:10.2307/1358848.

Stent, S. (2020) ‘Women surrealists and Egyptian mythology: Sphinxes, animals and Magic’, Ancient Egypt in the Modern Imagination, pp. 213-228. doi:10.5040/9781788319164.ch-013. Tisch mit Vogelfüssen (no date) Meret Oppenheim. Available at: https://www.christies.com.cn/zh/lot/lot-6469564 (Accessed: 18 September 2024).

Ventrella, F. (2020) ‘The writerly and the dialogical imagination of feminist art history’, Art History, 43(1), pp. 200-207. doi:10.1111/1467-8365.12484.

Zemel, C. and Pollock, G. (1990) ‘Vision and difference: Femininity, feminism and the histories of art’, The Art Bulletin, 72(2), p. 336. doi:10.2307/3045740.

Downloads

Published

2025-04-21