An exploration on the Cultural Loss in the Translation of Camel Xiangzi from the Post-colonial Perspective

Authors

  • Leqi Wang
  • Shulin Zhu

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61173/fhs3y970

Keywords:

Post-colonization, Cultural loss, Camel Xiangzi

Abstract

Chinese literature Camel Xiangzi, written by Lao She, has exerted a vast influence among overseas readers. Through the study, we found that despite Evan Kin’s excessive domestication and rewriting in his translation, his version still achieved great success in the United States at that time, which violated the literary and cultural value of the original work and constituted cultural hegemony to some extent. It is a pity that a classic work has become a tool for pleasing natives and that the cultural elements in it have been lost to varying degrees, partly to the point of exhaustion. Based on cultural dimensions such as language, religion, and society, as well as the characterization of the protagonist Xiangzi, this paper explores the phenomenon of cultural loss in Kin’s translation in terms of post-colonial theory. Moreover, we also recommend that translators attach great importance to having a responsible translation ethic, protecting cultural diversity, and advocating to restore the regional, linguistic, and cultural traits of the source language as originally as possible.

References

[1] Cai Juntao. On the English version of Camel Xiangzi from the perspective of post-colonialism [J]. Popular Literature, 2017, (14): 216-217.

[2] Lao She. Camel Xiangzi[M]. Beijing: People’s Literature Publishing House, 2000.

[3] Evan, King. Rickshaw Boy. New York: Reynal & Hitchcock,

[4] Lao She. Camel Xiangzi[M]. Shi Xiaojing, trans. Beijing: Foreign Language Press, 2001

[5] Liu Yingli. From the two English versions of Camel Xiangzi to see the influence of ideology on literary translation[J]. Journal of Changsha University, 2012, 26 (01): 112-114.

[6] Liu Jianzhao. Cultural loss in Ivan King’s translation of Camel Xiangzi from the perspective of postcolonial translation theory [J]. journal of hubei correspondence university, 2016, 29 (12): 155-156+165.

[7] Aona A. An Analysis of the English Translation of a Text with Chinese Characteristics Based on Perspectives of Translation Variation Theory[C]//2021 International Conference on Education, Language and Art (ICELA 2021). Atlantis Press, 2022: 567-571.

[8] Jahoda G. Images of savages: Ancient roots of modern prejudice in Western culture[M]. Routledge, 2018.

[9] Ming Road. Examining Evan Kin’s Translation of Camel Xiangzi from the perspective of postcolonial theory[D]. South China University of Technology, 2014.

[10] Sun Yifeng. Translation Studies and Ideology: Expanding the Space of Cross-cultural Dialogue[J]. China Translation, 2003, (05):6-12.

[11] Zhao Wenjing, Sun Jing. An analysis of interlingual rewriting in Evan Kin’s translation of Camel Xiangzi from the perspective of translation norms[J]. Journal of Henan Normal University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2012, 39(01): 228-230.

[12] Lu Yuanyuan. A Study on the English Version of the Camel Xiangzi by Evan Kin[D]. Beijing: Capital Normal University, 2008.

[13] Liang hao. Accepting and analyzing Ivan King’s translation of Camel Xiangzi from readers[J]. Today’s Ancient Literature Creation, 2023, (39):95-97.

Downloads

Published

2024-10-29