Mandarin Transfer and Chinese Primary Pupils’ Learning of English Connected Speech: From Evidence to Classroom Moves
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61173/9fvbfc22Keywords:
Mandarin transfer, connected speech, Chinese primary EFL learners, translanguaging pedagogy, superdiversity, pronunciation teachingAbstract
In the context of globalization, English proficiency constitutes a crucial component of intercultural communication and educational competitiveness. However, Chinese primary English-as-a-Foreign-Language (EFL) classrooms have long disproportionately focused on segmental features at the expense of suprasegmentals such as rhythm, reduction, and connected speech(liaison). This study employs literature analysis and case analysis to explore how Mandarin transfer both facilitates and hinders children’s acquisition of English inter-word transitions. Furthermore, it investigates the localization of these theoretical insights into practical pedagogical designs. Findings from previous research indicate that connected speech can be explicitly taught through perception-to-production tasks, and that first language (L1)-based pre-task planning enables learners in allocating cognitive resources to pronunciation and prosody, thereby improving accuracy and fluency. Under the lens of superdiversity, this paper also emphasizes the pedagogical value of translanguaging, which legitimizes the strategic use of Mandarin as a pedagogical scaffold to enhance intelligibility and reduce learner anxiety. Synthesizing the reviewed evidence and case interpretation, a five-step pedagogical framework—contrast, annotate, L1 outline, shadow, and bilingual reflection—is proposed to integrate positive transfer and mitigate negative transfer in primary EFL contexts. The study aims to provide a theoretically grounded yet contextually adaptable framework for teachers seeking to enhance pupils’ connected-speech competence, particularly within the constraints of exam-oriented classrooms.
References
[1] Cheng, J. (2023). Acquisition of English liaison among Chinese EFL learners from the perspective of language transfer. Heliyon, 9(10), Article e20418. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.heliyon.2023.e20418
[2] Liu, X., & Yeung, S. (2023). The effects of using L1 and L2 in pre-task planning on speaking performance: A withinsubject study. Asian Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 8(35).
[3] Guo, H. (2023). Chinese Primary School Students’ Translanguaging in EFL Classrooms: What is It and Why is It Needed? The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 32(2), 211– 226. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-022-00644-7
[4] Zhang-Wu, Q. (2023). Supporting Superdiverse Multilingual International Students: Insights from an Ethnographic Exploration. Research in the Teaching of English, 57(4), 378– 401. https://doi.org/10.58680/rte202332473
[5] Levelt, W. J. M. (Willem J. M. ). (1989). Speaking : from intention to articulation (1st ed.). MIT Press. https://doi. org/10.7551/mitpress/6393.001.0001
[6] Swain, M. (2005). The Output Hypothesis: Theory and Research. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of Research in Second Language Teaching and Learning (1st ed., pp. 471–483). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410612700-34
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 by the authors.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
