The Influence of Curatorial Art on Visual Art
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61173/80y4ke28Keywords:
Art exhibitions, digital media, visual artsAbstract
As time progressed and societal structures underwent transformation, there was a notable increase in interest in the memories encapsulated by objects. This resulted in a significant increase in the development and popularity of museums and art exhibitions, which in turn gave rise to a multitude of innovative spatial art forms, and the term “curation” was born. This research program examines the impact of the curatorial space on the visual presentation of artworks and its role in the visual arts as a whole. This is achieved using an analysis of several specific cases. Moreover, it demonstrates the evolution and advancement of the utilisation of curatorial space for the presentation of artworks. The concept of curatorial space is both flexible and complex, with implications for both the visual arts and their presentation. The utilisation of new media and technology in curatorial environments has been demonstrated to offer several advantages over physical curation. These include enhanced accessibility, flexibility, and the capacity to reach a broader audience. Consequently, curators and artists are presented with the chance to interact with audiences and cultivate innovative artistic practices and prospects in the domain of digital media and technology.
References
[1] Skrubbe J. Curating differently: feminisms, exhibitions and curatorial spaces. Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2016.
[2] Krukar J. Walk, look, remember: The influence of the gallery’s spatial layout on human memory for an art exhibition. Behavioral Sciences, 2014, 181-201.
[3] Marincola P. What makes a great exhibition? Reaktion Books, 2007.
[4] Shott M. An exegesis of the curation concept. Journal of Anthropological Research, 1996, 259-280.
[5] Post C. The art of digital curation: Co-operative Stewardship of net-based art. Archivaria, 2021, 6-47.
[6] Nekhvyadovichl L., Balakhnina L., Chernyaeva I. The Art Curator and Curation in the Works of Modern Researchers, 2019.
[7] Lerner F. Visual‐spatial art and design literacy as a prelude to aesthetic growth. International Journal of Art & Design Education, 2018, 65-73.
[8] Lage C. The Virtual Artist’s Book as a Space for Curatorial Experiments: The Acropolis Remix Project. Leonardo, 2021, 161-165.
[9] González J., Chavoya C., Noriega C., Romo T. Chicano and Chicana Art: A Critical Anthology. Duke University Press, 2019.
[10] Alexander V., Bowler A. Art at the crossroads: The arts in society and the sociology of art. Poetics, 2014, 1-19.
[11] Hardy C. Social space. In: Pierre Bourdieu, 2014, 229-249.
[12] Brieber D., Nadal M., Leder H., Rosenberg R. Art in time and space: Context modulates the relation between art experience and viewing time. PloS One, 2014, e99019.
[13] Babo-Rebelo M., et al. Aesthetic experience enhances first-person spatial representation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2022, e2201540119.
[14] Kanellidi P. The Contemporary Art Market: How digital globalization is changing the art world, 2019.
[15] Giannini T., Bowen J. Rethinking museum exhibitions: merging physical and digital culture—present to future. In: Museums and Digital Culture: New Perspectives and Research, 2019, 195-214.
[16] Marini C., Agostino D. Humanized museums? How digital technologies become relational tools. Museum Management and Curatorship, 2022, 598-615.
[17] Ghidini M. Curating on the web: the evolution of platforms as spaces for producing and disseminating web-based art. Arts, 2019, 78.
[18] Snyder I. Discourses of ‘curation in digital times. In: Discourse and Digital Practices, 2015, 209-225.
[19] Dean C., Donnellan C., Pratt A. Tate Modern: Pushing the limits of regeneration. City, Culture and Society, 2010, 79-87.
[20] Gonzalez D. Museum making: creating with new technologies in art museums, 2015.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 by the authors.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
