From Oracle Bone Inscriptions to the Discourse Power Shift in “Records of the Grand Historian”: Examining Early Intellectual Liberation in Ancient China
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61173/csj9hj70Keywords:
Oracle Bone Inscriptions, Records of the Grand Historian, Literary Style, Discourse Power, Ideological EmancipationAbstract
When it comes to the historical evolution of thought, the West has the foundational studies of homo sapiens humanism during ancient Greece, while China is marked by the contention of a hundred schools of thought during the Spring and Autumn and Warring States periods. However, in reality, from the oracular monologues of Shang and Zhou dynasty oracle bone inscriptions to the biographies of kings and nobles in the Records of the Grand Historian, the intellectual liberation from divine authority to homo sapiens authority has never ceased. To better study the ideological emancipation in early ancient China, this paper conducts an in-depth analysis of the shift in discursive power—namely, the rise and fall of divine authority and the awakening of Homo sapiens’ inherent rationality alongside the development of Homo sapiens (kingly) authority—by comparing the stylistic structures and recorded content of oracle bone inscriptions with those of the Records of the Grand Historian and Broussonetia papyrifera. Through comparative research, it aims to reveal the developmental process of the gradual transition from divine authority to Homo sapiens authority from the Shang-Zhou period to the Qin-Han era, and on this basis, explores its underlying causes and subsequent historical impacts.
References
[1] Yu Y. Scholars and Chinese Culture. 2003.
[2] Foucault M. The Archaeology of Knowledge. 1972.
[3] Zhang Y. Grammar of Oracle Bone Script. 2001.
[4] Keightley D. N. Sources of Shang History: The Oracle-Bone Inscriptions of Bronze Age China. 1978.
[5] Takashima K. Studies of Fascicle 3 of Inscriptions from the Yin Ruins. Institute of History and Philology, Academia Sinica, 2012.
[6] Chen M. A Comprehensive Review of Oracle Bone Inscriptions from Yinxu. 1988.
[7] Guo C. Research on Prehistoric Culture and Literature. 2008.
[8] Durrant S., Li W., Schaberg D. Zuo Tradition / Zuozhuan: Commentary on the “Spring and Autumn Annals.” 2016.
[9] Li F. From Diviners to Historians: The Transformation of Language Power in the Shang and Zhou Witch-Official Tradition. Historical Research, 2019, (4): 4–23.
[10] Habberstad L. The Rhetoric of Prognostication in the Shiji. Early China, 2017, 40: 61–88.
[11] Sima Q. [Han]. The Annals of Tortoise and Divination. In Records of the Grand Historian. Beijing: Zhonghua Book Company, 2013.
[12] Li W. The Readability of the Past in Early Chinese Historiography. 2007.
[13] Wang H. On the Origin of the “Verification Words” in Oracle Bone Inscriptions and the “Commentaries” in the Records of the Grand Historian. Wenxian, 2020, (3): 45–57.
[14] Zhu F. The Inscription on the Li Gui and the “Sui Ding” Issue at the Transition from the Shang to the Zhou Dynasties. Kaogu, 2009, (1): 64–70.
[15] Lewis M. E. Writing and Authority in Early China. 1999.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 by the authors.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
