Gender Bias in Linguistic Structures: A Comparative Study of French
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61173/5kbcgv20Keywords:
Gendered language, Gender bias, French, GermanAbstract
Language is a form of power that can shape the cognitive thinking of its users and even serve as a tool of domination for those in authority. Historically, language has been an instrument of patriarchy, with its use under patriarchal systems that often serving to suppress women. However, in the modern era, with the rise of feminism, there has been increasing attention to issues of gender inequality. Many linguists have begun to question whether gendered languages exacerbate existing gender biases. Yet, few have undertaken comparative analyses across different language families. Considering grammatical structures and language origins, this paper will examine French from the Romance language family and German from the Germanic language family—both of them are gendered languages. This study will conduct a comparative analysis to identify the gender biases present in these languages and to explain the cognitive and linguistic causes underlying these biases. By highlighting these issues, the research aims to raise readers’ awareness of gender bias in linguistic structures.
References
[1] Hellinger, M., & Bußmann, H. (2003). Gender Across Languages : the linguistic representation of women and men. Volume 2. John Benjamins Pub. Co.
[2] Zasyekin, S. (2009). Translation as a Psycholinguistic Phenomenon. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 39(3), 225– 234. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-009-9134-2
[3] Call for Submissions: Special Issue of Personality and Social Psychology Review on “Religiosity: Perspectives From Social and Personality Psychology.” (2008). Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34(4), 578–578. https://doi.org/10.1177/01 461672080340041101
[4] Carrington Lancaster. (1953). French Language and Literature. PMLA/Publications of the Modern Language Association of America, 68(2), 150–154. https://doi.org/10.1632/ s0030812900194829
[5] Carmody, F. J. (1935). Gender of French Nouns by Endings. The Modern Language Journal, 20(1), 19–21. https://doi. org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1935.tb02644.x
[6] Richard Tucker, Lambert, W. E., & André Rigault. (1977). The French Speaker’s Skill with Grammatical Gender. Janua Linguarum. Series Didactica.
[7] Seigneuric, A., Zagar, D., Meunier, F., & Spinelli, E. (2007). The relation between language and cognition in 3- to 9-yearolds: The acquisition of grammatical gender in French. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 96(3), 229–246. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.jecp.2006.12.003
[8] LYSTER, R. (2006). Predictability in French gender attribution: A corpus analysis. Journal of French Language Studies, 16(1), 69–92. https://doi.org/10.1017/ s0959269506002304
[9] Violin-Wigent, A. (2006). Gender assignment to nouns codeswitched into French: Observations and explanations. International Journal of Bilingualism, 10(3), 253–276. https:// doi.org/10.1177/13670069060100030101
[10] Wolfe, S. J. (1980). Gender and agency in Indo‐European languages. Paper in Linguistics, 13(4), 773–794. https://doi. org/10.1080/08351818009370519
[11] Fathi, R., & Lowenstamm, J. (2016). The gender assignment pattern of French nouns. Morphology, 26(3-4), 477–509. https:// doi.org/10.1007/s11525-016-9287-2
[12] Xiao, H., Strickland, B., & Peperkamp, S. (2022). How Fair is Gender-Fair Language? Insights from Gender Ratio Estimations in French. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 0261927X2210846. https://doi. org/10.1177/0261927x221084643
[13] Ewert, A. (1966). The French Language.
[14] Tibblin, J., van de Weijer, J., Granfeldt, J., & Gygax, P. (2022). There are more women in joggeur·euses than in joggeurs: On the effects of gender-fair forms on perceived gender ratios in French role nouns. Journal of French Language Studies, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0959269522000217
[15] Nelson, D. (2005). French gender assignment revisited. WORD, 56(1), 19–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/00437956.2005.1 1432551
[16] Prewitt-Freilino, J. L., Caswell, T. A., & Laakso, E. K. (2011). The Gendering of Language: A Comparison of Gender Equality in Countries with Gendered, Natural Gender, and Genderless Languages. Sex Roles, 66(3-4), 268–281.
[17] Richy, C., & Burnett, H. (2019). Jean does the dishes while Marie fixes the car: a qualitative and quantitative study of social gender in French syntax articles. Journal of French Language Studies, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0959269519000280
[18] Garnham, A., Gabriel, U., Sarrasin, O., Gygax, P., & Oakhill, J. (2012). Gender Representation in Different Languages and Grammatical Marking on Pronouns: When Beauticians, Musicians, and Mechanics Remain Men. Discourse Processes, 49(6), 481–500. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853x.2012.688184
[19] Lyons, J. (1968). Introduction to theoretical linguistics. Cambridge University Press.
[20] Misersky, J., Majid, A., & Snijders, T. M. (2018). Grammatical Gender in German Influences How Role-Nouns Are Interpreted: Evidence from ERPs. Discourse Processes, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853x.2018.1541382
[21] ROSCH, E. H. (1973). ON THE INTERNAL STRUCTURE OF PERCEPTUAL AND SEMANTIC CATEGORIES11This research was supported in part by a grant to the author (under her former name, Eleanor Rosch Heider) from the Foundations Fund for Research in Psychiatry # G67-392, in part by funds made available to the Child Study Center of Brown University from the Grant Foundation and from the National Institute of Neurological Diseases and Blindness, National Collaborative Project (Ph-43-68-13), and in part by research funds made available by the University of California at Berkeley (220 Grant #K9PF-429). I wish to thank Karl G. Heider for his help in the field in West Irian (Indonesian New Guinea), Dr. Robert Olton for assistance in carrying out Experiment 3, and Keith Burton, Randy Street, and Peter Lewitt who assisted with Experiment 4. Experiment 4 was performed with Dr. Richard Millward while the author was a research associate at Brown University. Cognitive Development and Acquisition of Language, 111–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-505850-6.50010-4
[22] Bem, S. L. (1981). Gender schema theory: A cognitive Dean&Francis account of sex typing. Psychological Review, 88(4), 354–364. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.88.4.354
[23] Carroll, S. (1989). Second-Language Acquisition and the Computational Paradigm*. Language Learning, 39(4), 535–594. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1989.tb00902.x
[24] Shi, R., & Melançon, A. (2010). Syntactic Categorization in French-Learning Infants. Infancy, 15(5), 517–533. https://doi. org/10.1111/j.1532-7078.2009.00022.x
[25] Cyr, M., & Shi, R. (2010). Grammatical gender categorization in infants. In 34th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, Boston, MA.
[26] Boloh, Y., & Ibernon, L. (2010). Gender attribution and gender agreement in 4- to 10-year-old French children. Cognitive Development, 25(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.cogdev.2009.09.011
[27] Guillelmon, D., & Grosjean, F. (2001). The gender marking effect in spoken word recognition: The case of bilinguals. Memory & Cognition, 29(3), 503–511. https://doi.org/10.3758/ bf03196401
[28] Bender, A., Beller, S., & Klauer, K. C. (2016). Crossing grammar and biology for gender categorisations: investigating the gender congruency effect in generic nouns for animates. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 28(5), 530–558.
[29] Opitz, A., & Pechmann, T. (2019). Gender Features in German: Evidence for Underspecification. Proceedings of International Conferences of Experimental Linguistics. https:// doi.org/10.36505/exling-2016/07/0028/000287
[30] McDonald, J. L., & Heilenman, L. K. (1991). Determinants of cue strength in adult first and second language speakers of French. Applied Psycholinguistics, 12(3), 313–348. https://doi. org/10.1017/s0142716400009255
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 by the authors.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
