Is it Morally Worse to Lie or to Mislead? An Exploratory Study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61173/0ebj3q77Keywords:
Lying, Misleading, Realistic ConversationsAbstract
This paper begins with linguistic definitions of lying and misleading and analyzes the difference between lying and misleading by comparing them in different contexts. The purpose of introducing the concept of implication at the outset is to help the reader differentiate between lying and misleading. Next, a comparison discussion inside a single conversational setting is presented to ascertain which behavior is ethically worse. This is done by introducing the identical case from real life. This research concludes that, generally speaking, lying is a more morally repugnant act than misleading. In certain instances, lying with the best of intentions is contrasted with misleading in general, and it is discovered that both are ethically acceptable since they are not deliberate and morally justifiable. Whereas misleading with a purpose is compared to ordinary lying, both of which are morally very bad behaviors are objectionable, which could inspire future readers.
References
as a math major. The following conversation took place: [1] STOKKE, A. (2013). LYING AND ASSERTING. The John: Hi Professor Ken, I would like to apply for a math Journal of Philosophy, 110(1), 33–60.
major at this university, do you think I have a chance of [2] Meibauer, J. (2011). On lying: intentionality, implicature, and success? imprecision. Intercultural Pragmatics, 8(2), 277-292.
Ken: As long as you keep up with what you are doing [3] Meibauer, J. (2018). The linguistics of lying. Annual Review now and keep working hard, I think you will have a good of Linguistics, 4(1), 357-375.
chance of being accepted into it, don’t worry too much. [4] Reboul, A. (2021). Truthfully Misleading: In fact, Ken knew that it would be almost impossible Truth, Informativity, and Manipulation in Linguistic for John to be accepted into the math department at this Communication. Frontiers in Communication, 6, 646820. university with his current abilities, but he didn’t want to [5] Lupoli M J, Jampol L, Oveis C. Lying because we tell the truth for fear that it would be a very serious blow care: Compassion increases prosocial lying[J]. Journal of
to John and put an unnecessary burden on him. In Ken’s Experimental Psychology: General, 2017, 146(7): 1026. opinion, telling the truth would only make the situation [6] Tuckett A G. The experience of lying in dementia care: A
worse, so he chose to lie. In this manner, John won’t be as qualitative study[J]. Nursing Ethics, 2012, 19(1): 7-20. sad and will feel more motivated and confident in himself [7] Cheng Qiyun, Sun Caixin, Zhang Xiaoxing, et al. Shortto do this seemingly insurmountable task. This is a classic Term load forecasting model and method for power system case of a pro-social lie; it’s easy to see that the liar, Ken, based on complementation of neural network and fuzzy logic.
had good intentions and that he genuinely cared about Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 2004, 19(10): John, which is why he told the lie; additionally, the lie 53-58. helped John by giving him more self-assurance and moti- [8] Fangfang. Research on power load forecasting based on vation to learn his favorite math. Usually, this kind of de- Improved BP neural network. Harbin Institute of Technology, ception takes place in a connection between a parent and 2011.
child, teacher and student, or another adult [6-10]. So, this [9] García-Carpintero, Manuel (2023). Lying versus misleading, type of lying doesn’t seem like a bad or even a very bene- with language and pictures: the adverbial account. Linguistics ficial behavior, but it still requires vigilance. After all, it’s and Philosophy 46 (3):509-532..
always uncomfortable when a person knows they’re being [10] Timmermann, F., & Viebahn, E. (2021). To lie or to lied to, and it can create some unnecessary problems. mislead?. Philosophical Studies, 178(5), 1481-1501. 5. Conclusion At this point the biggest difference between lying and mis-
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 by the authors.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
