Modern Silk Road— Historical Factors Influencing Present Opinions on BRI
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61173/e6zmtw02Keywords:
Silk Road, Belt and Road Initiative, Ancient customs and traits, Pre-modern diplomacy and foreign relationship, Ancient ChinaAbstract
This essay provides a comprehensive analysis of the historical reason behind the cautious attitude of the former Silk Road regions toward the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI). It starts with a detailed summary of the existing modern literature on the current respective views of the BRI from developing regions along the ancient Silk Road— Central Asia, Southeast Asia, and India. It then proceeds to search ancient texts for historical factors influencing the present. Connections between investigations of historical factors and studies of the literature on current opinions are drawn during the analyses. This research eventually shows that historical factors played a role in shaping countries’ cautious attitude toward the BRI. The results offer valuable insights from a historical perspective into many countries within vastly different regions and their people encompassed by the Belt and Road (B&R), thus shedding light on future policy- making related to the BRI and fostering mutually beneficial bilateral and multilateral cooperations between developing countries.
References
[1] Roman Vakulchuk and Indra Overland, “China’s Belt and Road Initiative through the lens of Central Asia,” in Regional Connection under the Belt and Road Initiative: The Prospects for Economic and Financial Cooperation, ed. Fanny M. Cheung and Ying-yi Hong (London and New York, 2019), 115–133, here 115.
[2] Vakulchuk and Overland, “China’s Belt and Road Initiative through the lens of Central Asia,” 119–126.
[3] Van-Hoa Vu, Jenn-Jaw Soong, and Khac-Nghia Nguyen, “Vietnam’s Perceptions and Strategies toward China’s Belt and Road Initiative Expansion: Hedging with Resisting,” The Chinese Economy 54, no. 1 (2021): 56–68, here 57, 67.
[4] Guanie Lim, “Resolving the Malacca Dilemma: Malaysia’s Role in the Belt and Road Initiative,” in Securing the Belt and Road Initiative: Risk Assessment, Private Security and Special Insurances Along the New Wave of Chinese Outbound Investments, ed. Alessandro Arduino and Xue Gong, (Singapore, 2018): 81–99, here 82, 95.
[5] Jenn-Jaw Soong, “Perception and Strategy of ASEAN’s States on China’s Footprints under Belt and Road Initiative (BRI): Perspectives of State-Society-Business with Balancing- Bandwagoning-Hedging Consideration,” The Chinese Economy 54, no. 1 (2021): 1–8, here 2.
[6] Soong, “Perception and Strategy of ASEAN’s States on China’s Footprints under Belt and Road Initiative (BRI),” 2.
[7] Zhenqing Zheng, “The Changing Asian Perception of China’s Rising: A BRI Context,” China’s Belt and Road Initiative in a Global Context 1 (2019): 41–59, here 45.
[8] Gulshan Sachdeva, “Indian Perceptions of the Chinese Belt and Road Initiative,” International Studies 55, no. 4 (2018): 285–296, here 291.
[9] Sachdeva, “Indian Perceptions of the Chinese Belt and Road Initiative,” 285.
[10] Abū Zayd al-Sīrāfī, “Chinese and Indian Customs Compared,” in Accounts of China and India, trans. Tim Mackintosh-Smith, ed. Philip F. Kennedy (New York, 2017), 24–28, here 24–25.
[11] al-Sīrāfī, “Chinese and Indian Customs Compared,” 25.
[12] al-Sīrāfī, “Chinese and Indian Customs Compared,” 26.
[13] Herodotus and Francis R. B. Godolphin, “Herodotus: On the Scythians,” The Metropolitan Museum of Art Bulletin 32, no. 5 (1973-1974): 129–149, here 139.
[14] Silk Road Seattle, Silk Road Narratives: A Collection of Historical Texts, Selections from the Han Narrative Histories, Beginnings of Relations with the Hsiung-nu.
[15] Silk Road Seattle, Silk Road Narratives: A Collection of Historical Texts, Selections from the Han Narrative Histories, The Mission to the West by Zhang Qian.
[16] Silk Road Seattle, Silk Road Narratives: A Collection of Historical Texts, Selections from the Han Narrative Histories, Notes on the Western Regions.
[17] Abū Zayd al-Sīrāfī, “The Changed Situation in China, and the Cause of It,” in Accounts of China and India, trans. Tim Mackintosh-Smith, ed. Philip F. Kennedy (New York, 2017), 30–32, here 32.
[18] Marc Lanteigne, “China’s Maritime Security and the ‘Malacca Dilemma,’” Asian Security 4, no. 2 (2008): 143–161.
[19] Lanteigne, “China’s Maritime Security and the ‘Malacca Dilemma,’” 145.
[20] al-Sīrāfī, “The Changed Situation in China, and the Cause of It,” 30.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 by the authors.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
