The Utilization of Confucian Ideology by the Manchus during the Qing Dynasty
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61173/qnycjg86Keywords:
Confucianism, Qing Dynasty, Power Dynamics, Manchus, Symbolic PowerAbstract
despite resistance often through force. Arendt emphasizes its collective and context-dependent nature. Luke‘s third Dimension of Power underscores its influence on perceptions and preferences sometimes conflicting with individual interests. Li highlights cultural agreements‘ impact on public interest illustrating how culture shapes power distribution. This understanding underscores the importance of considering cultural context when analyzing power dynamics and structures. Building on that I define power as a cultural consensus on public interest and proper usage of its exercise involving both the exertion and perception of power. While these frameworks primarily stem from discussions within the European context it is important to acknowledge that power may vary in other regions such as Asian cultures. In this essay I aim to explore how these Western understandings of power can be applied to Asian cultures focusing specifically on the utilization of Confucian ideology by the Manchus during the Qing dynasty.
References
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1991. Language and Symbolic Power. Harvard University Press.
Esherick, Joseph W. 2006. The Chinese Cultural Revolution as History. Stanford University Press.
Li, Wei Ying. 2023. “Regulatory Capture’s Third Face of Power.” Socio-economic Review 21(2): 1217-1245. https://doi. org/10.1093/ser/mwad007
Luke, Steven. 2005. Power: A Radical View. 2nd ed. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Mill, John Stuart. 1861. Considerations on Representative Government. Parker, Son, and Bourn.
Spence, Jonathan D. 2012. The Search for Modern China. 3rd ed. Norton.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 by the authors.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
