The Differences in Thinking between First-Language Learners and Second-Language Learners

Authors

  • Haoran Dong

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61173/03nf6f67

Keywords:

SLA, First language acquisition, Differences in thinking

Abstract

This paper explores the differences in thinking between first-language and second-language learners by analyzing the differences in thinking between first-language and second-language learners from three aspects: language intuition, cultural background, and language use. This paper’s method mainly uses comprehensive analysis from the perspectives of linguistics and psychology and combines some relevant literature and research. The results suggest that these differences in thinking give first-language learners an advantage over second-language learners in learning language, which can provide some pedagogical implications for providing some reasons and suggestions for second-language learners.

References

[1] Chomsky, N. (1995). Language and nature. Mind, 104(413), 1-61.

[2] Lenneberg, E. H. (1967). The biological foundations of language. Hospital Practice, 2(12), 59-67.

[3] Chiswick, B. R., & Miller, P. W. (2008). A test of the critical period hypothesis for language learning. Journal of multilingual and multicultural development, 29(1), 16-29.

[4] Sapir, E. (2004). Language: An introduction to the study of speech. Courier Corporation.

[5] Jiamin Zhao, Yong Wang. (2012). On the influence of cultural Differences between China and the West on translation. Science and Education Guide (middle third of a month)

[6] Giles, H., Mulac, A., Bradac, J. J., & Johnson, P. (2012). Speech accommodation theory: The first decade and beyond. In Communication yearbook 10 (pp. 13-48). Routledge.

[7] Aizawa, Y., & Whatley, M. A. (2006). Gender, Shyness, and Individualism-Collectivism: A Cross-Cultural Study. Race, Gender & Class, 13(1/2), 7–25. Gender, Shyness, and Individualism-Collectivism: A Cross-Cultural Study on JSTOR

[8] Lun, V. M. C., Fischer, R., & Ward, C. (2010). Exploring cultural differences in critical thinking: Is it about my thinking style or the language I speak? Learning and Individual differences, 20(6), 604-616.

[9] Stephen D. Krashen. (1985).Input Hypothesis: Theory and Implications

[10] Piaget, J. (2013). Principles of Genetic Epistemology: Selected Works vol 7. Routledge.

[11] Loschky, L. (1994). Comprehensible Input Omprehensible Input and Second Language Acquisition: What Is the Relationship? Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 16(3), 303–323. http://www.jstor.org/stable/44487746

[12] Dixon, L. Q., Zhao, J., Shin, J.-Y., Wu, S., Su, J.-H., Burgess-Brigham, R., Gezer, M. U., & Snow, C. (2012). What We Know About Second Language Acquisition: A Synthesis From Four Perspectives. Review of Educational Research, 82(1), 5–60. What We Know About Second Language Acquisition: A Synthesis From Four Perspectives on JSTOR

[13] Taormina, R. J., & Gao, J. H. (2013). Maslow and the Motivation Hierarchy: Measuring Satisfaction of the Needs. The American Journal of Psychology, 126(2), 155–177. Maslow and the Motivation Hierarchy: Measuring Satisfaction of the Needs | The American Journal of Psychology | Scholarly Publishing Collective

[14] Tolman, E. C. (1932). Purposive behavior in animals and men. Univ of California Press.

[15] Asgari, M., Ketabi, S., & Amirian, Z. (2019). Interest- Based Language Teaching: Enhancing Students’ Interest and Achievement in L2 Reading. Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research, 7(1), 61-75.

[16] Ebbinghaus.(1885).On Memory Hermann

[17] Matsumoto, K. (1996). Helping L2 learners reflect on classroom learning. ELT journal, 50(2), 143-149

Downloads

Published

2024-06-06