Supernaturalism as a Narrative Technique in “The Tempest” and “The Peony Pavilion”
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61173/w4t4nd59Keywords:
Supernaturalism, Greimas’ Matrix, plot devices, dramatic narrativesAbstract
The paper endeavors to investigate the narrative technique of supernaturalism within dramatic narratives, focusing specifically on “The Tempest” and “The Peony Pavilion” as exemplary works. This paper adopts a structural analysis approach, selecting “The Tempest” and “The Peony Pavilion” as case studies due to their shared presentation on supernatural elements. Drawing on Todorov’s classification, the paper characterizes both plays as fantastic/marvelous narratives where supernatural elements play a pivotal role. Through textual analysis and the application of the Greimas matrix, the research endeavors to elucidate how supernaturalism functions as a pivotal aspect of narrative construction, shaping plot development, character arcs, and thematic exploration. Furthermore, the analysis will investigate the broader cultural and literary significance of these supernatural motifs, considering their resonance within the respective socio-historical contexts of the works.Ultimately, the paper aims to elucidate the specific function of supernaturalism in shaping the form and themes of these two contemporary but cross-cultural cases of plays.
References
[1] Tan, Tian Yuan, Paul Edmondson, and Shih-pe Wang. 1616: Shakespeare and Tang Xianzu‘s China. The Arden Shakespeare, EBSCO Publishing, 2016.
[2] Fusini, Letizia. Looking for Common Ground: A Thematic Comparison between Tang Xianzu‘s and Shakespeare‘s Dramatic Imagination. Asian Theatre Journal, 2019, 36(2): 302- 326.
[3] Todorov, Tzvetan. The Fantastic: A Structural Approach to a Literary Genre. Translated by Richard Howard, The Press of Case Western Reserve University, 1973.
[4] Lodge, David. Working with Structuralism: Essays and Reviews on Nineteenth and Twentieth-Century Literature. Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1981. Dean&Francis
[5] Greimas, Algirdas. On Meaning: Selected Writings in Semiotic Theory. Translated by Hongmiao Wu and Xuejun Feng, Baihua Wenyi Press, 2005.
[6] Qian, Han, and Huang Xiuduan. The Journey of Greimas‘s ‚Sign Matrix‘. Literary Theory Research, 2014, 2:190-199.
[7] Zeitlin, Judith T. The Phantom Heroine: Ghosts and Gender in Seventeenth-Century Chinese Literature. University of Hawai‘i Press, 2007.
[8] Wei, Shihui. Reading ‚The Peony Pavilion‘ with Todorov‘s ‚Fantastic‘. Chinese Literature: Essays, Articles, Reviews (CLEAR), 2011, 33: 75–97.
[9] Herrington, H. W. Witchcraft and Magic in the Elizabethan Drama. The Journal of American Folklore, 1919, 32(126): 447– 485.
[10] Genette, Gérard. Narrative Discourse: An Essay in Method. Cornell University Press, 1980.
[11] Zeitlin, Judith T. Operatic Ghosts on Screen: The Case of A Test of Love (1958). Opera Quarterly, 26(2/3): 220–255
[12] Boğosyan, Natali. Postfeminist Discourse in Shakespeare‘s The Tempest and Warner‘s Indigo. Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2013.
[13] Cutts, John P. Music and the Supernatural in ‚The Tempest‘: A Study in Interpretation. Music & Letters, 1958, 39(4): 347- 358.
[14] Shen, Dan, and Wang Liya. Western Narrative Studies: Classics and Post-Classics. Beijing University Press, 2010.
[15] Tang, Xianzu. The Peony Pavilion. Translated by Zhang Guang-qian. Beijing: Tourism Education Press, 1994.
[16] Dymkowski, Christine. The Tempest. Cambridge University Press, 2000.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 by the authors.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
