Analysis of China’s “three supports and one assistance” policy from the perspective of policy tool
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61173/ps4y1q15Keywords:
three supports and one assistance, Policy instruments, Two-dimensional analysis, Text analysisAbstract
This paper takes China’s “three supports and one assistance” policy implemented from 2018 to 2023 as the research subject and conducts a quantitative analysis of policy texts through the establishment of a two-dimensional analytical framework. The study reveals that the overall policy structure in China is unbalanced, evident in issues such as an overemphasis on environmental policies, a lack of supporting construction policies, low participation from universities and rural entities, a relatively homogenous type of policy texts, and a dearth of authoritative legal and regulatory control documents. Consequently, it is imperative to appropriately optimize the overall structure of policy tools, comprehensively consider the rational layout of various policy instruments, enhance the development of supporting facilities, laws, and regulations, promote the long-term and sustainable role of universities and rural subjects in policies, and further supplement the diversity of relevant policy texts.
References
[1] Ao Rong.(2024-01-28). The employment situation improved gradually. The economic journal, 001.doi:10.28425/n.cnki. njjrb.2024.000592.
[2] Yan Rui.(2023). Thinking on the effective service of “Three supports and one assistance” for grassroots work -- A case study of Wenxi County, Shanxi Province. Employment and Security (10),73-75.
[3] Shao Yonglu.(2023). Heze, Shandong: Practice and thinking of “Three supports and one assistance” plan. Chinese Human Resources and Social Security (02),54-55.
[4] Yu Dejun.(2022). Thoughts on optimizing the plan of “Three supports and one assistance”. Teacher Exposition (36),7-9.
[5] Li Wenmin.(2017). Empirical research on “Three supports and one assistance” program.
[6] HOWLETTM, RAMESHM. Studying public policy: policy cycles and policy subsystems[J]. American Political science Association, 2009(2): 548-580.
[7] MCDONNELL L M, ELMORE ELMORE R F. Getting the job done: alternative policy instruments[J].Educational evaluation and policy analysis, 1987, 9(2):133-152.
[8] ROTHWELL R, ZEGVELD W. Industrial innovation and public policy: preparing for the 1980s and the 1990s[M]. London: Frances Printer, 1981:123.
[9] Deng Wei & Zhou Jieyou.(2023). Policy analysis of the National Fitness Implementation Plan (2021-2025) from the perspective of policy tools: A case study of ten prefecture-level cities in Guangdong Province. Sports science and technology (6), 82-86.doi:10.14038/j.cnki.tykj.2023.06.031.
[10] Jia Xunliang & Tian Jiajia.(2024). Quantitative analysis of the text content of China’s National Fitness Implementation Plan from the perspective of policy tools. Journal of Harbin Institute of Physical Education (01),43-50.
[11] Chen Jun & Zhang Yunjun.(2023). Policy analysis of Production-education integration in China’s higher education from the perspective of policy tools. Heilongjiang province higher education research (03), 64-71.doi:10.19903/j.cnki.cn23- 1074/g.2023.03.019.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 by the authors.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
