Persisting Shadows: Examining the Legacy of Gender Inequality in Chinese Family Dynamics and Resource Allocation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61173/x9f0d545Keywords:
Gender Inequality, Chinese Families, Resource Allocation, Cultural Norms, Educational Disparities, Societal ChangeAbstract
This study examines the persistent gender inequality in Chinese family dynamics, particularly focusing on the traditional preference for sons over daughters in resource allocation. It highlights the “Fu Di Mo” phenomenon, where women disproportionately support their brothers, reflecting deep-rooted patriarchal norms. The paper explores how these practices, rooted in historical cultural values, are perpetuated by economic and educational disparities. It argues for a multifaceted approach to address this inequality, involving policy reform, educational restructuring, and shifts in societal attitudes. The study emphasizes the need for comprehensive strategies to achieve gender equality in modern Chinese society.
References
of gender inequality perpetuated by cultural norms, (1)Cooper G.C.R., “Patterns of Interaction in Family economic considerations, and educational practices. This Relationships and the Development of Identity Exploration in complex interplay of factors has sustained a patriarchal Adolescence,” Child Dev, Vol.56, No.2,1985, pp.415-428. structure where the preference for sons over daughters (2)Lee, V. W. P., Ling, H. W. H., Cheung, J. C. S., Tung, S. Y. C., continues to influence family dynamics significantly. Leung, C. M. Y., & Wong, Y. C. (2021). The phenomenon of “Fu Di Mo” is a contemporary (3)Marginson, S. (2011). Higher education in East Asia and manifestation of this deep-rooted bias, illustrating how Singapore: Rise of the Confucian model. Higher education, 61, traditional practices have adapted to modern contexts but 587-611. still adversely affect women’s roles within the family and (4)Zheng, R. (1999). Revelation of the Imperial Examination --
The relationship between examination and education. Tsinghua (15)Tao, Z: High Bride Price: A Perspective to Understand the Journal of Education, 2, 12-16. Phenomenon of Exploitation in Rural Generations -- Reflections (5)Wang, J. (2005). American individualism and Chinese on Rural Women’s Early Marriage from a Gender Perspective, collectivism. Journal of Social Science of Jiamusi University, Folklore Studies, 3 (2011) 23(2), 75-76. (16)Lei, X., Shen, Y., Smith, J. P., & Zhou, G. (2017). Sibling (6)Zhao, W. (2019). The orientation of social ethics and its basic gender composition’s effect on education: evidence from China. connotation in the May Fourth “New Morality.” Journal of China Journal of population economics, 30, 569-590. University of Mining & Technology(Social Science), 2. (17)Ostrom E., et al., “Revisiting the Commons: Local Lessons, (7)Fei, X. (2019). Rural China. BEIJING BOOK CO. INC. Global Challenges”, Science, Vol.284, No.5412,1999, pp.78- (8)Liu, H. (2005). End the era of blind criticism of imperial 282. examinations. Southeast Academic Research, 4, 41-46. (18)Parish, William L. and Robert J. Willis, “Daughters, (9)Zuo, J. (2009). Rethinking family patriarchy and women’s Education, and Family Budgets Taiwan Experiences”, The positions in socialist China. Journal of Marriage and Family, Journal of Human Resources, Vol.28, No.4,1993, pp.863-898. 71(3), 542-557. (19)Blake J.,“Family Size and the Quality of Children”, (10)Gates, H. (1989). The commoditization of Chinese women. Demography,Vol. 18,No.4,1981, pp.421-442. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 14(4), 799-832. (20)Smith, P. C., “Asian Marriage Patterns in Transition”, (11)Littlejohn, L. J. (2017). Confucianism: How analects Journal of Family History, Vol.5,No.1,1969,pp.58-96. promoted patriarchy and influenced the subordination of women (21)Wang W.,“Son preference and educational opportunities in East Asia. of children in China— ‘I wish you were a boy!’”,Gender (12)Gao, X. (2003). Women existing for men: Confucianism and Issues,Vol.22,No.2,2005, pp.3-30. social injustice against women in China. Race, gender & class, (22)Chuan, A., List, J. A., Samek, A., & Samujjwala, S. (2022, 114-125. May). Parental Investments in Early Childhood and the Gender (12)Kristeva, J., & Kennedy, E. C. (1975). On the women of Gap in Math and Literacy. In AEA Papers and Proceedings (Vol. China. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 1(1), 112, pp. 603-608). 2014 Broadway, Suite 305, Nashville, TN 57-81. 37203: American Economic Association. (13)Guisso, R. W. (1981). Thunder over the lake: The five (23)Zhou, X. (2007). Review and reflection on the research of classics and the perception of woman in early China. Historical gender inequality in education in China. Journal of Shanghai Reflections/Réflexions Historiques, 47-61. Educational Research, (3), 14-17. (14)Chu C.Y.Cyrus, Yu Xie and Ruoh-rong Yu, “Effects of (24)Chen, Y. (2004). Sociological analysis of gender inequality Sibship Structure Revisited: Evidence from Intra-Family in hidden curriculum in China. educational science, 20(1), 13- Resource Transfer in Taiwan”, Sociology of Education, Vol.80, 16. No.2,2007, pp.91-113.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 by the authors.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
