Feasibility and Exception--The Grand Narrative Theory in the Myths of Buddhist Sculpture Art

Authors

  • Zhiyuan Yao

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61173/h0a31v77

Keywords:

grand narrative, Buddha statue art, secularisation, collectivity

Abstract

This paper explores the grand narrative, especially in the context of Buddhist sculpture art. It portrays grand narratives as broad, non-falsifiable systems stemming from a collective story, often focusing on universality and macro theories. The paper also highlights the link between grand narratives and myth. The author examines how grand narrative theory applies to Buddhist art, evident in visual forms like Buddha statues, which function as both religious symbols and narrative components. This article mainly consists of two lines of analysis. One line examines the representation of grandeur and narrative in Buddhist sculptures, while the other line examines the changes in the grand narrative of Buddhist sculptures. The former involves the relationship between images and texts, while the latter involves the feasibility of the end of grand narrative as proposed by Jean-François Lyotard’s theory of grand narrative.

References

Song, J. (2016). Muthos, logos, and theology in Plato’s Timaeus. Journal of Tsinghua University (Philosophy and Social Sciences), 31(2), 48-57.

Zhao, Y. (2018). Sakyamuni Buddha myth study: Centred on Buddha biography (Doctoral dissertation, Shaanxi Normal University).

Zhou, J. (2013). How to define art (Doctoral dissertation, East China Normal University)

Lyotard, J.-F. (1979). The postmodern condition: A report on knowledge. University of Minnesota Press.

Yu, W. (2010). Will the ‘grand narrative’ disappear? Chinese Journal of Social Sciences, 27(6), April.

Danto, A. C. (2007). After the end of art: Contemporary art and the pale of history (C. Wang, Trans.). Jiangsu People’s Publishing House. (Original work published 1997).

Pan, D.(2024).Arthur Danto’s anti-aesthetic: The grand narrative and its end in postmodernist art. Foreign Aesthetics,1,211–226.

Xie, H.(2003).Nomology: From grand narration to micro argumentation. Literature, History, and Philosophy. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.0511-4721.2003.04.023

Duan, J.(2023).The grand narrative symbols of Huawei: Heroes, chrysanthemums, and myths.Chinese & Foreign Corporate Culture,10,18–20.

Liu, M.(2016).From grand narratives to micro-narratives—Innovative creative concepts in the documentary Masters in the Forbidden City. Modern Communication(Journal of Communication University of China),9,109–111.https://doi.org/10.3969/ j.issn.1007-8770.2016.09.021

Shao, Y.(2006).The pursuit and dilemma of the “epicalization” of novel writing in recent years. Southern Literary Circle,6.https://doi.org/10.3969/ Dean&Francis j.issn.1003-7772.2006.06.010 Ma, X.(2009,September 8).Grand narrative and literary mainstream. China Art News.https://www.cflac.org.cn/ zgysb/wypl/200909/t20090908_1909.html

Kandinsky, W.(2008).Concerning the spiritual in art. The Floating Press.(first published in 1911).

Harari, Y.N.(2015).Sapiens: A brief history of humankind. Vintage Books.

King James Bible.(2008).Zondervan.(Original work published 1611).

Kundera, M.(2009).The unbearable lightness of being(pp.89–90).Harper Perennial.

Gregory Nagy. (1996)Homeric Questions.(Chapter III). University of Texas Press.https://chs.harvard.edu/book/ nagy-gregory-homeric-questions/

Marx, K., & Engels, F.(2009).The German ideology(Chapter III).People’s Publishing House.

Liu, X.(2007).The unbearable body. Huaxia Publishing House.

Foucault, M.(1970).The order of discourse. Editions Gallimard.

Xu, J.(2010).Analysis of Foucault’s theory of discourse and power. Wen Jiao Zi Liao,35,118–120.https://doi. org/10.3969/j.issn.1004-8359.2010.35.060

Norbu Wangdan.(2015).Narrative and construction of discourse: The way of textualizing the Epic of Gesar. Tibetan Studies,4,89–98.https://doi.org/10.3969/ j.issn.1000-0003.2015.04.010 UNESCO.(n.d.). Buddhist Monuments at Sanchi https:// whc.unesco.org/en/list/524/video/

Qudang Sengqie Tiba. (1987). The Sutra of the Fourfold Collection (Vol. 12, p. 122). In Zhonghua Zang (Vol. 32). Zhonghua Book Company

Xing, Y.(2022).A study of Buddha’s narrative images during the non-Buddha image period(Doctoral dissertation, East China Normal University).

Zhang, Y.(2008).The study on Chinese Buddhist art(Master thesis,Wuhan University of Technology).

Xu, J.(2010).Study on the artistic style of Buddha sculptures in the Han Dynasty(Doctoral dissertation, Nanjing University).

Peng, R.(2002).A study of Chinese Buddhist art(Doctoral dissertation, Sichuan University).

Cai, F.(2012).A study of the relationship between Gandhara sculpture art and folk literature(Doctoral dissertation, Peking University).

Ishimatsu, H.(2016).The Yungang Caves’ giant Buddha statues after Xianbei kings and Chinese emperors.Kokka,122(2),19–31. UNESCO.(n.d.).Longmen Grottoes. https://whc.unesco. org/en/list/1003/video/

Nagahiro, T.(1946).Eternal aspect and changing aspect(pp.14).Kōtōrin Press.

Abe, M (2007). Begin Japanology (Todaiji).NHK.World.

Huang, J.(2024).An analysis of the narrative relationship in the retelling of myths.Thought Front,50(2),165–172. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1001-778X.2024.02.019

Ge, Z.(2022).Chinese history of Zen thought(expanded ed.).Beijing University Press.P430-435 Huineng.(7 century). The Platform Sutra of the Sixth Patriarch: Chapter on Encounters (Vol. 48, p. 358). Taishō Shinshū Daizōkyō Publishing Company.

He, J.(2019). The Debate of Speech and Meaning in the History of Zen Painting.The World Religious Culture,(4). http://iwr.cssn.cn/zjwhysyjs/lw/202008/ t20200818_5170864.shtml

Huang, C. (2001). Buddhist Image Art. Hebei Province Buddhist College, p. 136.

Ge, Y. (2023). Opposition and integration of the sacred and the secular: A case study on Baoxi Temple in a region south of the Changjiang River (Doctoral dissertation, Shandong University).

Yun Shang Shi Xun. (2024). Grandma complains about “Nanhai Guanyin” (Source: Hangzhou Daily). Bilibili. https://b23.tv/o7C5jT1(Also see https://b23.tv/o7C5jT1)

Hagerty, P. (2004). Simulation and the decay of the real. Jean Baudrillard: Live Theory. London, England: Continuum. pp. 49–68. ISBN 0-8264-6283-9

Downloads

Published

2025-09-08