When American Humor Meets Chinese Expression: A Study on Humor Equivalence in Subtitle Translation of Young Sheldon—A Multidimensional Corpus-Based Comparative
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61173/1fghre60Keywords:
humor equivalence, subtitle translation, cog-nitive adaptation, three-dimensional corpus, Young Shel-donAbstract
This study investigates the equivalent transmission of American humor in Chinese subtitles through the analysis of Young Sheldon. By constructing a three-dimensional "language-culture-science" corpus (120,000 bilingual parallel texts) and integrating dynamic equivalence theory with pragmatics, the research reveals: Scientific humor retained only 54.3% of its laughability (LRR), but "terminology simplification + affective anchoring" strategies improved this to 89%. Cultural default humor increased its Comedy Acceptance Index (CAI) from 3.1 to 4.3 (5-point scale) using a gradient compensation model. Subtitle spatiotemporal constraints led to a negative correlation between information density and humor effectiveness (r = -0.72, p < 0.01). A "cognitive adaptation" decision tree model is proposed to optimize cross-cultural humor translation.
References
Beltagy, I., Lo, K., & Cohan, A. (2019). SciBERT: Apretrained language model for scientific text. Proceedings of the2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural LanguageProcessing (pp. 3615-3620). Association for ComputationalLinguistics.
Chen, Y., Liu, Y., & Lee, C.-R. (2021). Puns of the Day: Alinguistically annotated dataset for pun detection. Proceedings ofthe 59th Annual Meeting of the Association for ComputationalLinguistics (pp. 6542–6553).
Delabastita, D. (1996). Wordplay and translation: Specialissue of The Translator. Routledge.
Devlin, J., Chang, M.-W., Lee, K., & Toutanova, K. (2019).BERT: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers forlanguage understanding. Proceedings of the 2019 Conferenceof the North American Chapter of the Association forComputational Linguistics (pp. 4171–4186).
Díaz-Cintas, J. (2007). Audiovisual translation: Subtitling.Routledge.
Ghosh, D., Guo, W., & Muresan, S. (2020). Sarcasm detectionusing hybrid neural network. Proceedings of the 58th AnnualMeeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (pp.1477–1487).
Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J.L. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics 3: Speech acts (pp.41–58). Academic Press.
Hofstede, G. (2011). Dimensionalizing cultures: The Hofstedemodel in context. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture,2(1). https://doi.org/10.9707/2307-0919.1014
Liu, B. (2010). Sentiment analysis and subjectivity. In N.Indurkhya & F. J. Damerau (Eds.), Handbook of naturallanguage processing (2nd ed., pp. 627–666). CRC Press.10 Mikolov, T., Chen, K., Corrado, G., & Dean, J. (2013).Efficient estimation of word representations in vector space.arXiv preprint. https://arxiv.org/abs/1301.3781
Nida, E. A. (1964). Toward a science of translating.Brill.
Vandaele, J. (2002). Humor mechanisms in film trans-lation: The case of Woody Allen. Meta, 47(4), 499–511.https://doi.org/10.7202/008033ar
Verschueren, J. (1999). Understanding pragmatics. Ar-nold.
Wang, C.-K., & Hu, Y.-L. (2022). A study on humor ef-fects from the perspective of cooperative principle. Over-seas English, 22, 93–95.
Huang, B.-Y. (2019). Cultural default and translationcompensation in sitcom subtitling [Unpublished doctoraldissertation]. Shanghai International Studies University.16 National Association for Science Education. (2020).National science education terminology standards. NASEPress.
Oxford University Press. (2021). Oxford STEM termi-nology dictionary (3rd ed.).
State Language Commission. (2018). StandardizedChinese scientiic terms. Commercial Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 by the authors.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
