When American Humor Meets Chinese Expression: A Study on Humor Equivalence in Subtitle Translation of Young Sheldon—A Multidimensional Corpus-Based Comparative
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61173/1fghre60Keywords:
humor equivalence, subtitle translation, cog-nitive adaptation, three-dimensional corpus, Young Shel-donAbstract
This study investigates the equivalent transmission of American humor in Chinese subtitles through the analysis of Young Sheldon. By constructing a three-dimensional "language-culture-science" corpus (120,000 bilingual parallel texts) and integrating dynamic equivalence theory with pragmatics, the research reveals: Scientific humor retained only 54.3% of its laughability (LRR), but "terminology simplification + affective anchoring" strategies improved this to 89%. Cultural default humor increased its Comedy Acceptance Index (CAI) from 3.1 to 4.3 (5-point scale) using a gradient compensation model. Subtitle spatiotemporal constraints led to a negative correlation between information density and humor effectiveness (r = -0.72, p < 0.01). A "cognitive adaptation" decision tree model is proposed to optimize cross-cultural humor translation.
References
Beltagy, I., Lo, K., & Cohan, A. (2019). SciBERT: Apretrained language model for scientific text. Proceedings of the2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural LanguageProcessing (pp. 3615-3620). Association for ComputationalLinguistics.
Chen, Y., Liu, Y., & Lee, C.-R. (2021). Puns of the Day: Alinguistically annotated dataset for pun detection. Proceedings ofthe 59th Annual Meeting of the Association for ComputationalLinguistics (pp. 6542–6553).
Delabastita, D. (1996). Wordplay and translation: Specialissue of The Translator. Routledge.
Devlin, J., Chang, M.-W., Lee, K., & Toutanova, K. (2019).BERT: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers forlanguage understanding. Proceedings of the 2019 Conferenceof the North American Chapter of the Association forComputational Linguistics (pp. 4171–4186).
Díaz-Cintas, J. (2007). Audiovisual translation: Subtitling.Routledge.
Ghosh, D., Guo, W., & Muresan, S. (2020). Sarcasm detectionusing hybrid neural network. Proceedings of the 58th AnnualMeeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (pp.1477–1487).
Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J.L. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics 3: Speech acts (pp.41–58). Academic Press.
Hofstede, G. (2011). Dimensionalizing cultures: The Hofstedemodel in context. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture,2(1). https://doi.org/10.9707/2307-0919.1014
Liu, B. (2010). Sentiment analysis and subjectivity. In N.Indurkhya & F. J. Damerau (Eds.), Handbook of naturallanguage processing (2nd ed., pp. 627–666). CRC Press.10 Mikolov, T., Chen, K., Corrado, G., & Dean, J. (2013).Efficient estimation of word representations in vector space.arXiv preprint. https://arxiv.org/abs/1301.3781
Nida, E. A. (1964). Toward a science of translating.Brill.
Vandaele, J. (2002). Humor mechanisms in film trans-lation: The case of Woody Allen. Meta, 47(4), 499–511.https://doi.org/10.7202/008033ar
Verschueren, J. (1999). Understanding pragmatics. Ar-nold.
Wang, C.-K., & Hu, Y.-L. (2022). A study on humor ef-fects from the perspective of cooperative principle. Over-seas English, 22, 93–95.
Huang, B.-Y. (2019). Cultural default and translationcompensation in sitcom subtitling [Unpublished doctoraldissertation]. Shanghai International Studies University.16 National Association for Science Education. (2020).National science education terminology standards. NASEPress.
Oxford University Press. (2021). Oxford STEM termi-nology dictionary (3rd ed.).
State Language Commission. (2018). StandardizedChinese scientiic terms. Commercial Press.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 by the authors.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
