A Case Study on College Students’ Strategies for Employing Artificial Intelligence in Writing Second Language thesis

Authors

  • Ruixue Tang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61173/7y8s5n95

Keywords:

AI, ChatGPT, Higher Education, Machine Translation, L2 writing

Abstract

As artificial intelligence (AI) technology proliferates, its impact on second language education, has garnered significant attention. This study explores the strategies adopted by university students in utilizing AI tools, including machine translation and generative AI, during their second language thesis writing process. By conducting semi-structured interviews with Japanese majors, the study delves into students’ utilization strategies, perceptions, and their desired assistance when applying AI tools for academic writing. The findings reveal that students frequently rely on machine translation for comprehension and initial translation, while generative AI aids in summarizing, outlining, and refining language. While acknowledging the efficiency and quality enhancements AI brings, students also note limitations such as translation quality issues and potential misunderstandings with generative AI. Participants express needs for instructor guidance, training, and recommendations for suitable AI tools. This study concludes that AI tools hold promise for enhancing academic writing but underscores the importance of future research on larger scales to evaluate their long-term effects on writing skills and creativity. Furthermore, developing user-centered AI tools and integrating AI into writing curricula are recommended to maximize the educational benefits of AI-assisted writing.

References

[1] Aithal, P. S., & Aithal, S. (2023). Application of ChatGPT in Higher Education and Research–A Futuristic Analysis. International Journal of Applied Engineering and Management Letters (IJAEML), 7(3), 168-194.

[2] Atlas, S. (2023). ChatGPT for higher education and professional development: A guide to conversational AI. University of Rhode Island.

[3] Bao, K. (2017). An exploration of error types and error correction methods in google translate Chinese-English translation. Chinese Science & Technology Translators Journal (04), 20-23.

[4] Barrot, J. S. (2023). Using ChatGPT for second language writing: Pitfalls and potentials. Assessing Writing, 57, 100745.

[5] Bašić, Ž., Banovac, A., Kružić, I., & Jerković, I. (2023). ChatGPT-3.5 as writing assistance in students’ essays. Humanities and social sciences communications, 10(1), 1-5.

[6] Dempere, J., Modugu, K., Hesham, A., & Ramasamy, L. K. (2023). The impact of ChatGPT on higher education. In Frontiers in Education, 8, 1206936.

[7] Jolley, J. R., & Maimone, L. (2022). Thirty years of machine translation in language teaching and learning: A review of the literature. L2 Journal: An electronic refereed journal for foreign and second language educators, 14(1), 26-44.

[8] Maleki, M., & Tabrizi, H. H. (2017). A corpus-based study of human-translated vs. machine-translated texts: The case of ellipsis in English-Persian translation. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language Research, 4(1), 290-303.

[9] Mao, W., Xie, D., & Lang, H. (2023). Empowering Japanese language teaching with ChatGPT in the new era: scenarios, challenges and solutions. Foreign Language Research (06), 25- 33.

[10] Niño, A. (2020). Exploring the use of online machine translation for independent language learning. Research in learning technology, 28.

[11] Korol, T. (2022). Digital teacher feedback as a translation assessment tool. Journal of teaching English for specific and academic purposes, 9(4), 575-586.

[12] Strobl, C., Menke-Bazhutkina, I., Abel, N., & Michel, M. (2024). Adopting ChatGPT as a writing buddy in the advanced L2 writing class. Technology in Language Teaching & Learning, 6(1), 1-19.

[13] Wei, S., & Li, L. (2023). Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Second Language Writing Feedback: A Case Study of ChatGPT. Foreign Languages in China (03), 33-40.

[14] Wu, Y., & Li, C. (2022). A Study of the Impact of Machine Translation on Second Language Writing: Focus and Trends. Shanghai Journal of Translators (04), 35-39.

[15] Xu, F. (2021). Some key issues in the study of second language writing in China Foreign Language Teaching and Research (04), 571-581+640.

[16] Zhang, M., & Huang, Z. (2022). Crowdsourcing used in higher education: an empirical study on a sustainable translation teaching mode based on crowdsourced translation. Sustainability, 14(6), 3140.

Downloads

Published

2024-12-31