Construction and Research of Virtual Network Language from the Perspective of Sociolinguistics: A Case Study of TikTok Comment Section
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61173/0nb6dj77Keywords:
Sociolinguistics, Virtual Network Language, TikTokAbstract
With the popularization of the Internet, the Internet has become a part of people’s lives, and network language has emerged as a new language pattern with people’s Internet use. This paper selects three directions from TikTok’s popular categories, collects samples from the comment section of each category, and adopts the CAS to discuss how popular and minority views construct specific language forms through language interaction and fusion in virtual networks. Therefore, it can be concluded that the popular view is classified by different video content. Each category has its same discourse comment system. In contrast, the minority view describes a phenomenon or a certain state of mind according to the content behind the buzzwords or the reasons for their formation, takes the content of the hot words as a classification, and forms a specific discourse comment system under each type. Popular and minority views take different classification modes as the starting point of dissemination, and they jointly promote their respective discourse comment systems, turn them into Internet hot words, and promote the construction and development of Internet language.References
[1] Schlobinski, P. . David Crystal. Language and the Internet, 2001.
[2] Luhulima, C. C., Linuwih, E. R., Hutagaol, D. R., & Nofiyanti, N. Language Change on Social Media. International Journal of English and Applied Linguistics, 2024.
[3] Dai Manchun. Language Life in the Digital Age and Its Research. Foreign Languages, 2024, 17-25.
[4] Wang Ruopu. Cognitive Mechanism and Influence Analysis of Metaphor and Metonymy in Social Media Language. Modern Linguistics, (4): 354-359.
[5] Song, Yang, Feng, Yuhan. How New Media Language Communities are Constructed: A Case study of the Language Practice of Weibo BYM Community. Language for Strategic Studies, 2023, 26-38.
[6] Bao Xuesong. The Rise of Mass Culture and the Construction of Harmonious Society. Journal of the Party School of CPC Hangzhou, 2008, 1(1), 94-96.
[7] Duan Hui. Research on Minority Culture from the Perspective of Media Communication. Chinese Social Sciences Today, 2017.
[8] P a t h a k , V. , J e n a , B . , K a l r a , S . Q u a l i t a t i v e research. Perspectives in clinical research, 2013, 4(3), 192.
[9] Gibson G, Timlin A, Curran S, Wattis J. The scope for qualitative methods in research and clinical trials in dementia Age Ageing, 2004, 33:422–6.
[10] Lutfiah, V., Sudarwati, E. “JARGON USED ON TIKTOK CHECK…”: LANGUAGE VARIATION REVISITED. Jurnal Kata, 2021, 5(2), 359-371.
[11] Jialin, T. The study of internet language functions from the perspective of language variation and change: Case study of 2020-2021 buzz words. Transactions on Comparative Education, 2022, 4(1), 22-29.
[12] Wolfram, W. Sociolinguistic variation and the public interest. Cadernos de Linguística, 2021, 2(1), e357-e357.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 by the authors.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
