How Does Working Memory Capacity Affect the Accuracy of Simultaneous Interpreting

Authors

  • Danhong Wang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61173/ffswbz45

Keywords:

Simultaneous Interpreting, Working Memory Capacity, Cognitive Load, Multitasking, Cognitive Processing

Abstract

Simultaneous interpreting is an intricate and demanding task that requires real-time translation between languages. This complex process involves the interpreter listening to the source language, processing the information, and simultaneously delivering it in the target language. Such a task places considerable demands on cognitive resources, especially working memory, which is crucial for retaining and manipulating information over short periods. This paper delves into the impact of variations in working memory capacity on interpreting accuracy, with particular attention to the cognitive challenges posed by multitasking and managing cognitive load. By synthesizing existing research, the paper explores the connection between working memory capacity and interpreting performance, revealing that interpreters with higher working memory capacity are generally more accurate in their translations. Moreover, the review highlights cognitive strategies like chunking—breaking information into manageable units—and anticipation, which enable interpreters to cope with the substantial cognitive load inherent in simultaneous interpreting. These findings emphasize the vital role of working memory in the interpreting process and suggest that focused training on enhancing cognitive skills could lead to significant improvements in accuracy and efficiency, particularly in high-stakes environments where precision is critical.

References

[1] Morales, J. et al. Simultaneous interpretation selectively influences working memory and attentional networks. Acta Psychologica, 2015, 155: 82-91.

[2] Brown, C. Correlation between working memory, intelligence, and cognitive functions. J Altern Med Res, 2018, 10(2): 139-154.

[3] Mellinger, C.D. & Hanson, T. A. Meta-analyses of simultaneous interpreting and working memory. Interpreting, 2019, 21(2): 165 - 195.

[4] Köpke, B. & Nespoulous, J. L. Working memory performance in expert and novice interpreters. Interpreting, 2006, 8(1): 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1075/intp.8.1.02kop

[5] Stachowiak-Szymczak, K. Cognitive Load in Interpreting. In: Eye Movements and Gestures in Simultaneous and Consecutive Interpreting. Second Language Learning and Teaching. With Springer, Cham. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030- 19443-7_3

[6] Ayoob, A. et al. Managing Cognitive Load in Mul- timedia Presentations: Reducing Extraneous Processing. RadioGraphics, 2020, 40: 151-152.

[7] Huang, D. F. et al. Chunking in simultaneous interpreting: the impact of task complexity and translation directionality on lexical bundles. Frontiers in Psychology, 2023, 14: 01-14.

[8] Song, S. & Li, D. Aptitude for interpreting: the predictive value of cognitive fluency. The Interpreter and Translator Trainer, 2023, 17(1): 155-172.

[9] Wang, H. et al. Expertise differences in cognitive interpreting: A meta-analysis of eye tracking studies across four decades. WIREs Cognitive Science, 2023, 15(1), First published: 19 October 2023 https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.1667

[10] Stieff, M. et al. Visual chunking as a strategy for spatial thinking in STEM. Cogn Res Princ Implic, 2020, 5(18), Published online 2020 Apr 18. doi: 10.1186/s41235-020-00217-

[11] Wolff, C. E. et al. See and tell: Differences between expert and novice teachers’ interpretations of problematic classroom management events. Teaching and Teacher Education, 2017, 66: 295-308.

[12] McCauley, S. M. & Christiansen, M. H. Individual differences in chunking ability predict on-line sentence processing. In Cognitive Science. 2015.

Downloads

Published

2024-12-31