The Enlightenment and Reference of Finland’s Special Education Financial Model to China

Authors

  • Xuanzi Tan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61173/10d0rd15

Keywords:

China, Finland, special education, inclusive education, fiscal policy

Abstract

This study aims to investigate the financial system of special education in Finland and explore the implications of Finland’s experience for China. The research methods include literature review and statistical data analysis. The main issues include allocating special education funds, management models, and their effects between the two countries. This article compares the financial background and current situation of special education in China and Finland, pointing out challenges such as insufficient funding, uneven resource allocation, and shortage of professional personnel in China. By comparison, Finland adopts an inclusive education fiscal system that emphasizes fairness and efficiency. Through centralized financial support and flexible resource allocation, it has achieved high-quality development of special education. China can learn from Finland’s experience in rational planning of financial investment and improvement of policy support, to enhance the quality and equity of its special education and improve China’s national policy on special education. Summarizing Finland’s experience and providing insights for China, it is recommended that China learn from Finland’s successful practices in funding, resource allocation, audit evaluation, and professional training to optimize the use of special education resources and enhance educational equity and quality.

References

[1] Du Y. Funding guarantee pattern and policy outlook for inclusive development of special education. Special Education in China, 2024, (03): 12-22.

[2] He Z. Research on regional differences and trends in fiscal investment efficiency: A case study of special education. Chinese Market, 2023, (04): 10-12.

[3] Liu C. Main problems and countermeasures of public education financial expenditure in China. Modern Education Management, 2016, (09): 47-52.

[4] Jiang H, Zeng W, Wang Y. Finland‘s experience in building an education-strong country. Basic Education Reference, 2023, (08): 19-31.

[5] Björk-Åman C, Ström K. Between structure and individual needs: a discourse-analytic study of support and guidance for students with special needs in Finnish vocational education and training. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 2024, 68(2): 260-272.

[6] Paloniemi A, Pulkkinen J, Kärnä E, et al. The work of special education teachers in the tiered support system: The Finnish case. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 2023, 67(1): 35-50.

[7] Ahmed A, Meng D. Expansion of special education and promotion of inclusive education in China: conflict or cooperation? Stakeholders‘ views. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, 2022, 22(2): 188-205.

[8] Pang W. Research on the current situation and development of inclusive education for persons with disabilities in China. Research on Persons with Disabilities, 2017, (04): 35-43.

[9] Peng X, Qi Y. Policy suggestions for improving the development level of special education. Special Education in China, 2014, (12): 3-8.

[10] Wang X, Gu Z, Yang J, et al. Professional identity and professional development agency of special education teachers in China: a moderated mediation model. Current Psychology, 2024, 43(30): 25234-25246.

Downloads

Published

2024-12-31