An analysis of gender culture based on the Internet language of “Mad literature”
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61173/xqgff829Keywords:
Mad literature, Pragmatic principle, Network language, genderAbstract
Mad literature, as a new language phenomenon, although it has appeared for a short time, it has seized the psychology of contemporary young groups, and the group resonance generated by it has promoted the rampant reproduction of mad sayings, which still occupies a place in Internet terms today. From the perspective of linguistics, this paper will classify the form and content of crazy sayings, analyze the social expression effect of this kind of sayings on gender by using pragmatic principles, and explore the causes and effects of the elimination of gender differences in the ecology of network language by taking mad literature as an example.
References
on the Internet, attracting the approval of many women. [1] Editorial Committee of Chinese Idiom Dictionary. Modern To a certain extent, the existence of mad literature can Chinese Dictionary 7th edition [M]. Shanghai: Fudan University speed up women’s own awakening, dare to face the dif- Press,2019.07. ficulties of others and fight back, rather than blindly un- [2] Paul Wazlawick, “The Pragmatics of Human Communication: conditionally submit to the unreasonable views of others. A Study on the Pathology and Paradoxes of Interaction Patterns” It encourages women to show their true and brave selves [M]. Shanghai: East China Normal University Press,2016.08. to each other. “It is better to go crazy than to lose one- [3] He Zan. An Introduction to Pragmatics [M]. Changsha: self”, which also means that individuals no longer have Hunan Education Publishing House,1988.04. to strive for a compromise to win favor. No need to fall [4] GEOFFREYLEECH.PRINCIPLES OF PRAGMATICS[M]. into the meaningless cycle of self-internal friction again, LONGMAN,1983. encourage individual women to walk out of the gaze of [5] Zhang Gongjin, Ding Shiqing, Ed. Cultural Linguistics others, put their attention back to themselves, re-under- Course [M]. Beijing: Educational Science Press,2004.07. stand themselves, examine themselves, and do beyond [6]Zhou Xiaofeng, Li Haiping. A Study on the estimation and
analogy of the relationship between form and Meaning [J]. [7] Shen Tianjian. “going crazy” cultural critique of the [J]. Journal of Northeast Normal University (Philosophy and Social Journal of new media research, 2023, 9 (3) : 107-111. Sciences Edition),2011, (04): 270-271
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 by the authors.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
